This is obviously a very sensitive issue, but I want to give my opinion on today’s verdict. In my opinion this is the most balanced judgment that any court can give, and most importantly the court which itself was a victim of Nov 3 martial law. But the 14 member bench and specially the chief justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Chaudhry had created history by giving a sensible and balanced decision, they would have taken revenge from Gen Musharraf and the present Government, but they proved that their decisions will not be influenced by agony that they and their families have received due to Gen Musharraf and Government. This decision is an example for generations to come, it is also an example for our pathetic politicians and rulers that the work they were supposed to do is done by Supreme Court. What a shame for parliament who considers themselves as representatives of people that their work is done by Supreme Court, and the parliament is instructed to review the ordinances. Why the parliament and the present Government had not done it before? Why they had not even nullified Nov 3 acts? Why they have not nullified NRO and other important ordinances? If everything is supposed to be done by Supreme Court, then what is the point of having a parliament?
So Atleast now judiciary is independent and is making decisions for strengthening Pakistan and not to destabilize the system, otherwise the Supreme Court would have given a harsh decision which would have destabilized the system and would have produced anarchy and chaos among the whole nation.
I want to say that if there would be a trial for dictator’s actions, then there should be a trial for past and present Governments also who have looted million of dollars from Pakistan’s treasury and had done nothing for the people of Pakistan and had not fulfilled their promises. Why Is there no case against Zardari, who after publicly making promise said that it is not Quran or Hadees? How can a President of an Islamic republic say this type of bullshit? Who no one has ever filed a reference against it? Or SC has taken suo motu notice? This is not a little issue, in Islamic way of life the leaders should have high moral values and they should be examples for the people. I am not a constitutional expert but the thing is it is written that President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan should be a Muslim. And how can a person be a Muslim if he doesn’t fulfills his promises?
0 comments:
Post a Comment